Asking
someone, “are you liberal?” is a very different question than asking someone
“are you a liberal?” That single article makes a big difference in the response
to this questions and it forces people to realize that they might not have the
best working knowledge of what a liberal is, what liberalism is, and where they
fall along this line. Modern American liberalism is the dominant version of
liberalism in the United States and it is characterized by social liberalism
and a mixed economy. Taken outside of the United States, this issue becomes
more complicated so we will stay within the borders of our country. The
previous definition is the typical definition that most Americans call to mind
when faced with questions about their understanding of liberalism.
However,
in a recent article about classicliberalism by Rick Kelo, the economist and financial expert explains how
this is only one side of the liberal coin. The term liberalism diverged into
classic liberalism and social liberalism in the late 1800s, with social
liberals hijacking the term liberty and using it in a different way than was
traditionally intended. According to Lord Acton, “a liberal’s polar star is
liberty—who deems those things right in politics which, taken all round,
promote, increase, perpetuate freedom, and those things wrong which impede it.”
If we unpack this quote about classic liberalism, we can draw obvious contrasts
between this definition and our modern understanding.
Classic
liberalists promote economic individuality that is relatively free from
government constraints. In contrast to modern liberalists who tend to promote
more government regulation in order to forward their social agendas. True
liberalism began as a philosophy that put control over economic decisions into
the hands of individuals, allowing them to make the economic decisions that
best suited their personal interests and families. So a major point of
contention between classic liberals and modern liberals is this idea of
government intervention.
For Richard Arthur Kelo, a guardianof liberal democracy (on SlideShare and other blogging platforms), drawing
comparisons between modern and classic liberals is a means of helping clear
some of the misunderstandings of the rhetoric surrounding current American
politics. When talking about any economic or political issue with another, it
is important to have the same working definitions as whomever you are speaking
with. That is why the term “liberal” needs to be more clearly defined and used
with a bit more prudence in mainstream political dialogue.
No comments:
Post a Comment